Do *people* ever write *love* stories about validation? the love of one invalid to another? because this is the story this is the "way" (the way-it-is). series of validations and recognitions and -connaissances.
one brewin up in here up in here and it's about 'karl karl karl' so 'ever ee buddy' he is, and some girl x who has net yet to be constructed but she's very postmodern and everything is very postmodern she her identity is n/a because she is too n/a to be recognized by any other single identity, a forest cannot recognize a tree in a mirror but only a forest, and so too her mother and her girlfriend and her bestfriend are benign in their love
thus! karl karl karl the embodiment of everyone that he is, their love and recognition and carnal relatskinships, their reflection(ss), unjudged in his eyes yield the recognition of herself in his (upon-closer,intimate-inspection-affected) pupils: as she too is no body, but repercussions and/of individual's-deconstruction ("thrift stores" urban apparel borrow`ed clothes)
-characters' so ill-defined so unfortunate so amalgamated: does the piston see itself in the mirror or can only the four-stroke be seen (if we're looking for consumerism ignition, does then one of this pistons burst and disengage and rust in the countryside(or the ocean)),
does the wine see only her bottle?
::fastforward, time travel, 180 halfcab nosemanuel: that's maya angelou up there she's smarter wiser everything cerebral'r than the previous people
i've ever heard speak, and i had lunch with john mccain.
she talks about communication and that's what i like and she uses and bottle metaphor which is what else i lykke. i'm using maya angelou
i'm feeling wretched right now do you know wretched? it comes from "wretch" which meant adventurer at some point, and then got turned into "exilee." isnt that a good story? that word has a better story than a lot of people
FEMINISM//JESSIE//ALEXAM//SUKI (fourth, four: ...the importance of the woman! ie the usercomment):
brief interview #46
"Alls I was trying to say is you have to be careful of taking a knee-jerk attitude about violence and degradation in the case of women also. Having a knee jerk attitude about anything is a total mistake, that’s what I’m saying especially in the case of women, where it adds up to this very limited condescending thing of saying they’re fragile or breakable things and can be destroyed so easily. Like we have to wrap them in cotton and protect them more than everybody else. That it’s knee-jerk and condescending. I’m talking about dignity and respect, not treating them like they’re fragile little dolls or whatever. Everybody gets hurt and violated and broken sometimes, why are women so special?"